Sorcerer Survey

[Justin]

Hello everyone, this is a poll to find out if you would like to port Sorcerer Revised into our world. If you have any questions about it, you can post them here. Justin and I will try to answer them as soon as possible.

[Shah-Khohr of Ventrue]

Being an avid fan of both systems, I do have a few simple requests to go with my positive vote.

1) PLEASE for the love of whatever, stand by the rule that forbids static and dynamic magic from existing in the same being (No Arete and Pyschic twinks).

2) Please hold them to standard character creation. It's a common pitfall to treat Sorceror like the ghouls of Mage (which, I guess they kinda are), but there is more then enough to them to keep them functional within a group of True Mages.

and 3) Keep a cap on em to maintain their unique view.

Thanks,

-Rob.

[Mike Wozencraft]

2. Are you talking about standard mage pc creation, or standard sorcerer creation? Because sorcerers start with lower stats in everything at char-gen, unless the 'equal for all' option is used from sorcerer revised.

as for psychic powers...ehhh. I wouldn't outright say no, but psi powers should be a case by case basis. I don't think we need pyrokinesis running around the city. We'd just end up being swamped in Marsh Institute agents.

[Shah-Khohr of Ventrue]

The 'Equal for All' is highly fair in my world.... but that's also MY world, and not this world.

As for psychics, I don't think any of them should be barred, I just don't think any TRUE MAGE should have access to them.

[Victoria Nania]

I'm with the Equal for All character creation, and totally down with Psychics, so long as a MAGE doesn't have them.

[Justin KG]

Understood and very reasonable. Phil and I are both of the opinion that awakened and static magic should not rest in the same being.

As far as the "Equal for All" option, Phil and I will have to talk about it.

3) Keep in mind that the majority of the tradition population is made up of sorcerers, but since we are not playing a Sorcerer game there will more than likely be a cap on thier numbers.